Jadeja Injured in 1st T20I against Australia

Indian former cricketer Virender Sehwag backs India’s decision of concussion substitute of Chahal for Jadeja in the first T20I against Australia. In the first T20I against Australia, Jadeja has ruled out in the second innings owing to an injury he faced in the last over of the 1st innings.

Jadeja was consequently replaced by concussion substitute Yuzvendra Chahal, who proved crucial for India with his impressive figures of 3/25 in the first T20I.

Australian side were not very much pleased with India’s move. But the 42 year old former Indian opener opined that India were absolutely right in replacing Chahal in Jadeja’s place.

Jadeja injured in the last over of the 1st innings of Australia vs India 1st T20I match
Jadeja injured in the last over of the 1st innings of Australia vs India 1st T20I match

Sehwag on concussion substitute for Jadeja

“From our side, it was a right decision as Ravindra Jadeja was not fit to play and could not bowl as well,” Sehwag, who is an expert on ‘Sony Six’, said.

“It was an opportunity which India got because he was hit on the head and when you are hit on the head, nobody can say that concussion will happen at that time. It takes time. You might get symptoms within 24 hours.”

Sehwag feels that Australians shouldn’t be complaining as they were the first beneficiaries of the concussion substitute rule.

Chahal gets in as concussion substitute for Jadeja
Chahal gets in as concussion substitute for Jadeja

“When Steve Smith was hit on the head, Labuschagne came out to bat in place of him and made runs. So, Australia also got that advantage. So I think Australia shouldn’t complain.

“They might have just one contention that Jadeja continued to bat and made runs but when you open your helmet inside the dressing room then you might witness some swelling, you might feel dizziness. There is a possibility.”

“I was hit on the helmet many times so I know how it feels but during our times there were no such rules.”

Sanjay Manjrekar questions on Indian physio

Ravindra Jadeja has a trainer tend to his leg during a break in batting against Australia.

Indian physio Nitin Patel’s absence on the field of play just after Ravindra Jadeja got hit on the head by a Mitchell Starc bouncer in the final over of the innings is a “breach” of concussion protocol, feels former India batsman-turned-commentator Sanjay Manjrekar.

Jadeja injured in 1st T20 vs Australia
Jadeja injured in 1st T20 vs Australia

Did India breached ICC protocol?

“There is one important breach of protocol that has happened,” Manjrekar said on ‘Sony Six’ on Friday. “I am sure the match referee will raise with India but one of the main things with that protocol, the moment you get hit on the head, they (physio) have to spend time with the batsman out there, asking how he feels.

“The physio (Nitin Patel in this case) has to come in and there are a certain set of questions that need to be asked. With Jadeja, it just happened, there was hardly any delay and he continued playing,” Manjrekar said.

Tom Moody too raised question

In fact, former Australia cricketer Tom Moody also raised doubts about severity of Jadeja’s injury since it didn’t require medical attention.

Tom Moody
Tom Moody

“I have no issue with Jadeja being substitute (sic) with Chahal. But I do have an issue with a Doctor & Physio not being present after Jadeja was struck on the helmet which I believe is protocol now?” asked former Australia cricketer Tom Moody, who is now a coach and a commentator.

Manjrekar on his part said that Jadeja continuing to bat didn’t give any massive advantage to India as they added only nine runs after that but credibility of his injury can be questioned.

Sanjay manjrekar
Sanjay manjrekar

“He added just 9 runs, it wasn’t a massive advantage. But after that (hit), there should have been at least 2-3 minutes where India support staff should have come out. And then it would have looked a little more credible.”

However, Manjrekar agreed that match referee David Boon had no option but to allow India a concussion substitute.

“I would say one thing though, David Boon had no choice but to give India the concussion substitute because he would not have the courage to say he wouldn’t allow it because, at the time of impact, no attention was given,” he said.

“He had to give the concussion substitute once the request was made.”